For those of you that could join us on Saturday: Thank You! Opposites attract: select fonts from different categories Trying to match two serif fonts or two sans serif fonts might be one of the most delicate scenarios a designer can encounter. The three typefaces shown above are all called Garamond because they are based on the original Garamond, but they display quite a variation in letter width, structure, and design features between them. These look machine-made. The choice of combination is successful because the two fonts share a similar design language and feel, including their x-heights. Also, many Arabic typefaces are made specifically for multinational corporations, like Apple and IBM, and cannot be sold or downloaded. On Saturday, 9 July , — Laura Meseguer will be participating in a panel discussion on collaborative processes in type design and will discuss her team's experiences in working on In this sample the author seemingly wanted the Japanese texts to have the same distinctive hierarchy for each piece of information as the two Latin texts alongside it. For all who have support this research: Thank you!

WOMAN | MAN

Now we are looking at pairing typefaces — definitely a difficult task that requires a balance of knowledge, eye experience, and boldness. One of the most common questions we have encountered over the past fifteen years as professional type designers is about combining typefaces. How can you successfully pair fonts? What general guidelines can be applied to find the right match? What are the pitfalls? Starting is often the hardest part. The first useful steps toward a happy typographic match are to define clear goals, to analyse the content being designed, and to understand its structure, function, and audience. Appropriate font selection read our article here also plays an important role in this initial process. This sets the stage by choosing the right fonts for the content in question. Our subconscious mind will feel something very different from what was intended because these intangible associations we have with lettershapes are conditioned by our common visual heritage. So your concern should be about a good match between the style, semantics, and intended impact of your text and the corresponding properties of the chosen typeface. Do they match? Excessive use of fonts is not a sign of good design if there is no structural need for variety. In communication design, type has the task of serving the content and delivering information in an engaging, not confusing, way. Granted, your options to give enough personality to the design are limited when using just one style.

Now we are looking at pairing typefaces — definitely a difficult task that requires a balance of knowledge, eye experience, and boldness. One of the most common questions we have encountered over typographic matchmaking past fifteen years as professional type designers is about combining typefaces. How can you successfully pair fonts?

Typographic matchmaking general guidelines can be applied to find the right match? What are the pitfalls? Starting is often the hardest part. The first useful steps toward a happy typographic match are to define clear goals, to analyse the content being designed, and to understand its structure, function, and audience.

Appropriate font selection read our article here also plays an important role in this initial process. This sets the stage by choosing the right fonts for the content in question. Our subconscious mind will feel something very different from what was intended because these intangible associations we have with lettershapes are conditioned by our common visual heritage.

So your concern should be about a good match between the style, semantics, and intended impact of your text and the corresponding properties of the chosen typeface. Do they match? Excessive use of fonts is not a sign of good design if there is no structural need for variety.

In communication design, type has the typographic matchmaking of serving the content and delivering information in an engaging, not confusing, way. Granted, your options to give enough personality to the design are limited when using just one style. Focus on making the most out of it and really fine-tune your microtypography by taking special care of letter spacing, indents, line-spacing, column width and length, hyphenation, and the like.

Setting a piece in just a single style is tough, but the simplicity of it can produce typographic matchmaking beautiful results. How much can you do with one great typeface? A font style is when you switch from an upright to an italic, a display or titling version, a contrasting width, or a special case like a unicase style.

Choosing small caps or an italic can be a perfect way to suggest a change of pace and add visual texture without drawing as much attention as a bold weight typographic matchmaking. As a piece grows in complexity and requires different levels of hierarchy you should reassess how well a type family is handling those requirements.

Using a font made for paragraphs in a headline situation will usually not produce the desired results. Fonts for continuous paragraph reading have built-in design details necessary for legibility in small text sizes, but look rather crude and uc berkeley hook page in big sizes. Typefaces for body text and titling are different in their design even if they belong to the same family.

Fonts for small text cocktail waitress a dating need to be more robust, and a lower stroke contrast is preferable because thin lines would break up when scaled down to small type sizes. A comprehensive type system can display even bigger differences in stroke contrast, design features, and width proportions between the members, as shown here in the new Literata variable font.

A variable font offers even more possibilities to fine-tune these factors according to function and medium of the piece. Famous characters: getting to know you Some master punchcutters left us their legacy of typefaces they made during the first centuries of type-making.

Students in their first typography lessons in design school are introduced to Granjon, Griffo, Didot, and many others. This is perfect for learning how typefaces differ from each other, getting to know the various typographic categories, and basic typesetting rules, but special care is needed when selecting one of these typefaces. They differ in quality, aesthetic value, language support, and character set so that no two Garamonds are the same.

The font name should therefore not be the exclusive point of reference and be accepted without further scrutiny. The three typefaces shown above are all called Garamond because they are based on the original Garamond, but they display quite a variation in typographic matchmaking width, structure, and design features between them.

Changing the appearance is useful for many reasons: to stress words or comments, to source speakers or speech level changes, to create cross references, and more. However, when too many different typefaces are used, the reader is unable to determine quickly what is and is not important. Clarity suffers.

Probably the most important factor to consider when using different fonts in the same block of text is to match their optical size and not their point size notation. The Latin alphabet is mainly read along the x-height, so matching x-heights will ensure that distinct fonts fit each other more graciously in a line of text. Another aspect to bear in mind is combining similar letter proportions and their look and feel, unless you want to clearly change the pace of reading. For example, using a word set in a Garalde italic within a narrow stiff Bodoni style will inevitably stop the reading flow.

In this example there are two levels of emphasis: change of colour and change of typeface from serif to sans. Even if you can't understand the language, it is clear the author wanted the reader to pay particular attention to these words.

The choice of combination is successful because the two fonts share a similar design language and feel, including their x-heights. The right personality: more than a pretty face A useful approach is to organise typefaces according to their intrinsic structure and general feel, which provides a more simple and helpful system than traditional classifications such as the Vox system.

We recommend thinking in terms of two big groups: on one hand, the organic class has shapes that relate to handwriting, where hints of the broad nib pen are seen more easily, both in general proportions and how strokes are created.

They appear to be typographic matchmaking by a human with a casual hookup android. These look machine-made. Sticking to one of these broad categories when combining fonts, especially within the same block of text, can lead to a much more harmonious typographic palette. Contemporary typefaces may very well fall into a grey area, having both mechanic and organic features. Combining fonts that fall into one of the broader categories, mechanical and organic, will have a more successful and harmonious outcome, especially when used in the same block of text.

Choose either the right or left sides for good combinations. Dominants and submissives: obvious hierarchies In situations where a block of text is significantly larger than the rest, as when comparing headlines to body text, a more eclectic approach to type pairing can create the desired tension.

There is certainly more typographic freedom for matching text and titling couples. Combining distinct and diverse typefaces can create a more obvious hierarchy and generate higher levels of visual interest. Always take into consideration the aesthetic concordance between fonts and the content, and between different typographic blocks. Some level of continuity will reinforce the general atmosphere of the design. Be bold though and clearly decide to either accentuate diversity or deliver a more homogeneous result.

The design language typographic matchmaking atmosphere of the fonts used in this sample is so far apart, that the outcome creates an unpleasant tension despite the distance to each other. There is also a striking imbalance of content and the appearance of the typeface used in the sub headline. It evokes a very different feel from what the actual content is. Marriage between cousins: not always the best idea The so-called superfamilies can be an appealing choice when designers are typographic matchmaking with complex design problems.

It seems simple when all the design decisions have been prepackaged. Keep in mind though, just because they belong typographic matchmaking the same type system does not automatically mean all family members work well together. The most common mix are serif and sans serif sometimes semi-serif subfamilies which share typographic colour, general proportions, and style.

They are a safe choice when consistency is required, keeping a similar atmosphere and information level. However, a critical caveat to this solution is whether the selected styles still have enough tension and a good amount of their own personality between them. It is important to remind ourselves about a crucial principle: if another font is needed, it is important that readers can recognize it as a different design element.

If fonts look too much alike, it will seem like an error and not as a conscious design decision. It is recommended to not rely exclusively on type family systems. Sometimes the differences are too weak and produce too much uniformity because the letterforms have the same structure with just small details changed.

Opposites attract: select fonts from different categories Trying to match two serif fonts or two sans serif fonts might be one of the most delicate scenarios a designer can encounter.

Read more mentioned, a situation in which fonts are set at very different sizes and for different functions is less likely to pose problems.

But you may need to resort to other tools in order to help readers navigate the page in cases when printing size is quite similar. The casual reader might brother dating site a subtle, discordant, and unpleasant undertone within the design. Conscientiously choosing type from different typographic matchmaking is the simple solution to this problem. Though website development has advanced drastically, rendering performance of text fonts online can still be problematic, especially if the audience is more likely to read on older computers.

Using web-safe fonts is a good decision in those cases. As text font Georgia is used, getting the right performance on screen. Both fonts work well together, because they share similar structure and are used in radically different sizes. They do not compete with each other. Love across continents: adding font flavour Typographic matchmaking different scripts on a page requires, first and foremost, certain knowledge of how these scripts work and a very clear understanding of the typographic matchmaking different scripts play in each design.

Are scripts equally important or is one of them taking the leading role? Is the same information presented in both languages or does the content complement each other? Understanding these issues will give designers the tools for font matching. Even in writing systems that are nothing like the Latin script, we can find typographic colour, organic and mechanical natures, stroke tension, and modulation — all things that we can visually assess and intuitively use to click a perfect typographic pair.

In this sample the author seemingly wanted the Japanese texts to have the same distinctive hierarchy for each piece of information as the two Latin texts alongside it.

In this latter case they would probably use two very different typefaces. The Adelle Sans superfamily above is comprised of nine scripts so far, each with harmonious proportions, tone, capabilities, and purpose so that typesetting them is as simple as possible. Office romance: typeset your way to the top In both digital and print editorial design, the delivery of information is multifaceted and makes the selection of a good typographic palette increasingly complex.

For example, newspapers, information design, reference books, and multilingual manuals need to convey the many kinds of content with different levels of importance and stress. Headlines, decks, and body text interacts with images, footnotes, tables with numbers, section titles, and navigation items… all of which should work together as one whole design object to grant the best possible readability and provide a spicy mix of harmony and tension. Simply apply the matchmaking criteria we have elaborated in the points above to this complex scenario, just on a greater scale.

In these cases, it is not uncommon to employ several large type families together or even commission a tailor-made typeface family that would cater to all the typographic matchmaking needs.

A professional matchmaker may be required — a typographic cupid so to speak — who could help with the selection and pairing process early in the conceptual stage. So, if in doubt, simply contact your trusted type foundry and start the conversation. And if you have yet to make such a connection, reach out to us. Clarin, the largest newspaper in Spanish language, uses a careful mix of retail and tailored fonts to create a cohesive appearance and effective content delivery.

TypeTogether is an indie type foundry committed to excellence in type design with a focus on editorial use. Additionally, TypeTogether creates custom type design for corporate use.

WOMAN | MAN